When I first started reading this article and I read “[Paternity] as the source of power” (Marcotte), I thought this article was going to be
about the dominance of men in television shows.
When I read this sentence it really struck me and I had to sit back and
think about it. Paternity as the source
of power. I kept repeating it in my
head. Why does paternity have to be the
source of power? What makes it so that
males have all or at least most of the power in many different cases of life
and they can never be broken down or fall apart?
But as I
kept reading this article, it became clear that majority of the shows Marcotte discussed
are about tearing apart masculinity and making the oppressed, or in other words
women, more powerful. “Americans can’t get enough of watching powerful men run
into walls created by the limits of narrow, traditional masculinity”
(Marcotte). I found it really
interesting when Marcotte discussed how shows such as Friday Night Lights, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad all start with a dominant male character who ends up
falling apart and a woman comes into major importance in his life to get him
back on track. However, the show could
not just start off with the dominance of the woman. In order to be successful, the show has to
being with a male who portrays the dominant masculine societal values and then
it can go in any direction it choses, whether that is to have a dominant female
show up in the picture or just stick with the dominant male.
So to go
back to the beginning of my post, I guess paternity is the source of power in television right now even though there
may be some shows that go against it.
But overall, majority of the television shows that are viewed daily display
dominant male characteristics.
No comments:
Post a Comment