Showing posts with label romance novels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romance novels. Show all posts

Friday, January 20, 2012

Since when could romance novels be a release?


Radway put a different spin on romance novels for me. Typically I view romance novels as pieces of work that depict stories of relationships that its readers wish could happen to them. I feel like most romance novels are synonymous with fantasy novels due to the fact that I have never witnessed love for anyone to occur with overwhelming romance. After reading Radway’s work, I had many questions, but also formed a few new opinions on how I should actually view the impact of romance novels on its clientele.

The Gill and Radway readings made me really think of how audiences actually consume items such as romance novels and how they use these books as an ‘out’ or a ‘release.’ I actually felt sympathetic for the women that were interviewed in the study in Radway’s piece. It seems like they read these books in order to live vicariously through its characters in order to hope that there still may be hope for them to experience a movie-like romance in their lives. However, they are unattainable. These books have the structure to make women yearn for these experiences. The romantic novels use normal settings, normal people, and true love as its components for its plot, and they concoct a storyline that professes life values that true love is blind and that there is one person out in the world for you to its readers that live in a society where obviously that isn’t always true because the divorce rate is the highest it’s ever been. This sets up its readers for failure! How can one love her own life when they are getting sucked up in books weekly that have relatable characters that are achieving true happiness in every novel? It must be tough. I never thought that there was this kind of potential impact out there in the book world.

Radway makes strong claims in her reading, and Gill’s work is very complimentary to the problems Radway discusses. Audiences consume differently in different areas and demographics. Yes, the effects of romance novels have common effects on its readers; however, they are stronger and weaker in different places. Thus, people are experiencing the issues of romance novels pressuring their own personal lives, but the difference in degree of certain impacts are differing from area to area. This was a very interesting topic to read about, especially for a male college student. I never thought that a certain genre of literature could have such a major impact on a demographic, especially when they are considered ‘hits’ and ‘classics’ by book critics.

Escapism Through Fantasy


The idea of escapism encapsulated within romance novels is quite fascinating as pointed out by Radway. The denial of a present reality is achieved by a journey into a fictional world where love is discovered through an exciting romance. It is the hyperbole of the fantasy, which appeals to many of the women. Such stories are clearly unrealistic, but are understood as such. The fantasy world makes escaping easy and the comfort of a happy ending allows for the bleakness of daily news and family drama to be swept away.

It seems interesting that women (not all, but certainly far more than men) gravitate to romance novels for escape. Is it further evidence of a hegemonic system that begins when they are little? The escape to a place of a man’s love seems in a way misogynistic, yet this story line is aimed strictly at women. However, maybe it is okay to say, it simply does not matter. These particular women described happiness and relaxation when reading these books. If it truly does make them happy then who is to question their behavior? The authors are creating content their readers want, and they seem to have a clear concept of what that is. It is possible that examining the content of these novels as a reproduction of a hegemonic structure with man at the top is simply a case of over analysis.