The article by Fiske aims at looking at how TV creates
masculine and feminine subject. The author examines soap operas for feminine
narratives. Fiske looks mainly at soap operas, but he also looks at Charlie’s
Angels when discussing female characters or the roles that they have in these
TV shows. I found it incredibly interesting that in the soap opera narratives
women cannot have a happy marriage or life. They end up having affairs because
they are unsatisfied with their lives. Yet, the men in these soap operas appear
to take on a more ‘feminine’ role. They engage in intimate dialogue and come
across as more emotional and caring. It is positive to note that traditions “macho”
men are construed as the villains in soap operas. It suggests that our ideologies
toward how men should behave toward women are shifting. Yet, this is not
consistent with the women in soap operas who also use their body to seduce a
man to get what they want in the shows. This is unsettling to me because the
ideology that women are supposed to want a happy home and marriage yet can
never achieve it is always in the background. Also, that they only way to get
what you want is to use your body as a form of currency. When looking at
Charlie’s Angels, the idea of patriarchy is still heavily embedded in the shows
narrative. I happen to love Charlie’s Angels and was really surprised and
enlightened when reading this article. The female characters are the one’s who
do the ‘job’ but they rely on Charlie and Bosley to tell them what they need to
do and give them all of the tools they need. These women are only doing what they
are told. They are not resourceful or independent. This article demonstrated that
it might look like
ideologies are changing, but that the standards of patriarchy are heavily laced
within the background of these media texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment