In considering semiotics and
content analysis, content analysis only gives you the quantitative basis for
the representations of things while semiotics show how meaning is created
rather than what the meaning is. The structure of the meaning is deciphered by
breaking down an advertisement, considering how objects and things work
together to elicit a certain understanding. The audience, the combination of
particular objects, and the absence of particular things work together in
constructing a reality. In addition, culture and tradition are important to the
context of an advertisement and breaking down meaning.
In my opinion semiotics are much
more useful than content analysis in understanding how advertisements work. For
instance taking into consideration an object in relation to the context of the
setting. Perhaps content analysis looks at the number of revealing body images
of women in advertisements. If the ad is for a swimsuit it is likely that a
women is shown in minimal clothing, which could render it revealing. The
quantitative aspect of content analysis doesn’t consider why the woman is
wearing the bathing suit; maybe she is in a warm place, on the beach
advertising a vacation spot, or, maybe she is in a car advertisement appealing
to a male crowd. From content analysis we may never know. But these two
different situations show how a woman in a bathing suit could elicit different
ideals and without considering the semiotics, the content analysis becomes
unrealistic. The combination of what is used in the ad to render a certain
affect is essential to meaning; it’s silly to consider an advertisement without
breaking it down and looking at how the parts sum up the whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment